13 Most Intelligent People In The History Of The World

Category: Financial News

We know these people are exceptionally intelligent and talented. But just how intelligent are they compared to each other? Here are 13 of the most intelligent geniuses in the world, or at least as far as two Western scientific studies had afforded us.

How we get the IQ

Estimating the IQ levels of people who had died centuries before a refined scientific intelligence benchmarking had been developed is tricky; but here we have two of the most often quoted studies: the 1926 Early Mental Traits of 300 Geniuses by American psychologist Catherine Cox, who computed the IQs of geniuses from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century; and the 1994 Book of Genius by English learning expert, Tony Buzan, who ranked a more encompassing 100 greatest geniuses of our world.

The disparity in their lists is evident. Buzan had Da Vinci at the top with an IQ of 220, while Cox gave the artist-inventor only 180 points. Still, it’s fun averaging the two lists to see who among these geniuses trump their fellow brainiacs in sheer IQ performance. Those who didn’t appear in the top twenty of both lists are automatically out of the game, but it’s not to say they are any less than intelligent than the people in this list (we can never tell).

Moreover, the list didn’t include twentieth-century geniuses such as Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi and Stephen Hawking. Likewise, you’ll note that these are European geniuses; hence, mind masters from Asia did not appear, too. Those things aside and without further ado, here they are: the most genius of geniuses and their mind-boggling IQ levels and achievements.

13. Charles Dickens – IQ level: 165


The English writer, poet, social critic. He is known for his literary masterpieces including Great Expectations, Oliver Twist, A Christmas Carol and David Copperfield. He is also regarded as the greatest novelist of the Victorian period, the time when England reigned supreme in the literary, science, trade and military world.

12. Raphael – IQ level: 170


Yet another Renaissance artist made it to our list, the Italian contemporary of Da Vinci and Michelangelo. Raphael was a painter and architect, the third member of the trio great masters of the High Renaissance. His most famous works include the Mond Crucifixion, the Deposition of Christ, and the Transfiguration.

11. Michael Faraday – IQ level:175


The English scientist who received little formal education. His works advanced the fields of electromagnetism and electrochemistry, the precursor of the high technologies that we enjoy today. Testament to his genius, numerous scientific principles are named after him: Faraday’s law of induction; Faraday effect: Faraday cage; Faraday paradox; Faraday wheel; and Faraday wave among others. His research would make it possible for later inventions in electricity and current.

10. Baruch Spinoza – IQ level: 175


A Dutch philosopher. He was among the first to lay down the foundation of the age of Enlightenment that saw science challenged the status quo of the Church. The age led to great leaps in the fields of science, politics, and economics, spearheaded by among others, Spinoza’s magnum opus, the Ethics, which challenges the authenticity of the Hebrew bible.

9. Michelangelo – IQ level: 177


Tied with the French philosopher is another Italian Renaissance man, the sculptor, painter, architect, poet, and engineer, Michelangelo.  Famed for his masterpieces, namely David, Pieta, Sistine Chapel, The Last Judgment, and The Creation of Adam. Many experts even argued he is the greatest artist of all time, a subjective account yet not without substance considering his contributions to the High Renaissance art.

8. Desiderius Erasmus – IQ level: 177


A Dutch humanist, theologian, social critic. He was a strong advocate of religious tolerance during the Reformation age, when Catholics and Protestants were at each other’s throat. Using humanist techniques, he prepared a new batch of Latin and Greek editions of the New Testament, which would become influential materials during this tumultuous time. Although critical of the Church, Erasmus maintained his Catholic faith, believing the Catholic hierarchy could be reformed internally without the need to create an offshoot faith.

7. Rene Descartes – IQ level: 177


The French philosopher, mathematician, and writer. He is called the Father of Modern Philosophy because of his writings. Notably, the Meditations on First Philosophy is still a standard reference in universities around the world. He is also renowned for his mathematical contributions, specifically the Cartesian coordinate system and for bridging algebra and geometry that made the development of calculus possible.

6. Galileo Galilei – IQ level: 182


The Italian physicist, astronomer, mathematician, philosopher. He is best known for giving us the telescope. But that’s just a mere speck in his wide-reaching scientific achievements, namely the discovery of planetary objects such as Callisto, Galilean moons, Europa, Ganymede, and Io. He was also responsible for confirming through actual observation the heliocentrism nature of the solar system—the sun is at the center and the planets revolve around it—putting him at the crosshair of the Inquisition during his time.

5. John Stuart Mill – IQ level: 182.5


An English philosopher and political economist. He is best known for his influential contributions to liberalism, the idea of individual freedom in contrast to unfettered state control in handling the economy. The Mill’s method is also widely used today to arrive at a conclusion via induction, a tool that lawyers and scientists have used in advancing their arguments.

4. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz – IQ level: 191


The German philosopher and mathematician. He is regarded to have contributed to the development of calculus independent from Newton, notably his works, Law of Continuity and Transcendental Law of Homogeneity. He was also a prolific inventor in the field of mechanical calculators, making it possible for non-genius like us to calculate complex mathematical problems with the aid of this device.

3. Isaac Newton – IQ level: 192


The English physicist and mathematician. He is regarded to have developed much of calculus, the building blocks of today’s engineering feats. His Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy is one of the most influential scientific works, heralding the age of enlightenment when Europe burst into an era of advancements that gave birth to modern technologies.

2. Leonardo Da Vinci – IQ level: 200


The Italian Renaissance man. His genius spanned across science and art. Best known for his Mona Lisa, Da Vinci was actually more than an exceptionally talented painter.  He was a mathematician, engineer, inventor, sculptor, architect, geologist, cartographer, botanist, and writer. He was the epitome of the Renaissance man, bringing to the world his wealth of knowledge to advance mankind’s fate.

1. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe – IQ level: 220


The German poet, novelist, playwright, politician, and diplomat. He’s best known for his literary works, such as, The Sorrows of Young Werther, Sturm und Drang, and Faust. Although he’s best regarded as a literary genius, Goethe was also involved in scientific studies, particularly in the field of natural science. He had a wide collection of minerals as part of his extensive studies in geology.

These people might appear remarkable and rare, but genius is more prevalent than we imagine it to be. “Everybody is a genius,” so said Einstein, “but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing it is stupid.”

Louie Andre

By Louie Andre

B2B & SaaS market analyst and senior writer for FinancesOnline. He is most interested in project management solutions, believing all businesses are a work in progress. From pitch deck to exit strategy, he is no stranger to project business hiccups and essentials. He has been involved in a few internet startups including a digital route planner for a triple A affiliate. His advice to vendors and users alike? "Think of benefits, not features."

Related posts

David Grant Stewart, Sr. says:

Nancy, you claim that "men are more intelligent than women" is a lie but you have no proof whatsoever.

Reply to this comment »
Dougie says:

Can't find Nikola Tesla on the list though.

Reply to this comment »
Beau says:

Tesla is apart of a latter day trendy phenomena. Yes, he was highly accomplished, but not likely to be considered among the genius elite.

Reply to this comment »
Alad Roness says:

The wise go for knowledge and fools ignore knowledge

Reply to this comment »
Gad Barzilai says:

It’s a partial list- you should have included Einstein and Marx

Reply to this comment »
Lo says:

The IQ test wasn't invented until 1904, and to this day still debated how accurate or useful it really is.
So why is all this false information about IQs being published on this site? How did you arrive at these numbers?
If Einstein, who pioneered several fields of scientific study, and still hasn't been proved wrong, presumably had a IQ of about 130, how do you tie ficticious IQs with a raking of intelligence through out history?

It would be helpul and honest if you publish your answer for all to see, thank you.

Reply to this comment »
Gi says:

Yes I agree. I don't think IQ is an accurate means of measuring someone's intelligence.

Reply to this comment »
In reply to Gi's comment, Joe Spinozia says:

The people who say that IQ is meaningless are usually the ones who come out at the wrong end of it. Over and over again when the IQ of children is taken in the lower grades, it is a valuable predictor of later success in life. Estimating the IQ's of smart people who lived long ago is difficult but can be extrapolated by a number of factors such as how many areas did they excel in and examining their body of work. There's no doubt that the polymath Leonardo da Vinci was extraordinarly intelligent because he had a broad variety of things that he excelled at and was able to come up with ideas that nobody else had thought of.

In reply to Gi's comment, David Grant Stewart, Sr. says:

IQ tests are environmentally dependent. An American would flunk an English IQ test and vice versa.
Nobody on the planet knows how to judge intelligence.
Here's how:
1. What was your greatest discovery?
2. How long did it take you to make it?

The greatest and most basic principle in the universe is the attributes of cycles in time and space. When these are known, it is then and only then understood how and why the addition of one proton to a nucleus can affect the chemical attributes of the outer electron shell.

Melissa Clifford says:

I read this - and a number of Gould's other books - many years ago and still feel that it demonstrates so much wisdom.

“I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.”

― Stephen Jay Gould, The Panda's Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History

Reply to this comment »
David Grant Stewart, sr. says:

The notion of IQ is based on the assumption that intelligence stops increasing at 15. This is pure baloney. There is no upper limit to human intelligence. My intelligence has increased all my life and will continue to do so throughout all eternity. I have translated 72 modern and ancient languages professionally and will continue to pursue my interest in ancient languages, which are far superior than modern languages. The very fact that every language on the planet is inferior in every way to its parent language proves that Darwin's theory of organic evolution is pure trash. The ancients lived longer and were far more intelligent than anyone on the planet today. Nobody on the planet knows how to read Egyptian Hieratic. The entire book entitled The Pearl of Great Price was translated from seven lines of Hieratic, about one half of one side of an index card. Nobody on the planet understands this.
There is no such critter as Anubis. It is a butchered translation of Moroni. His hieroglyph is the jackal, and his titles are "He who stands upon his hill" and "the guardian of sacred records by which the world shall be judged. In the hieroglyphs he is represented as a recumbent jackal atop a chest full of sacred records.

Reply to this comment »
In reply to David Grant Stewart, sr.'s comment, Rick McDowell says:

I take these as just to invite discussion. I would put Da Vinci #1 but I have seen lists with Goethe #2, so I am endeavoring to learn about that, and note there is no discussion here so far on that ranking (of Goethe #1).

What about Plato, Marcus Aurelius, Einstein?

Agreed that an IQ test isn't a great measure of intelligence, just the best we have.

David jarrett says:

Geniuses cannor be compared. The further back in history the less was known about many more subjects, therefore they were able to create more firsts steps on the ladder. So much has been discovered now they are reztricted to specialised fields.

Reply to this comment »
David jarrett says:

You cannot compare geniuses. They all have a specialised field. The further back you go the less was known so geniuses began the first step to climb.

Reply to this comment »
Estla says:

Plural for Genius is 'Genii' by the way guys. NOT 'geniuses'.

Reply to this comment »
Wayne says:

Rubbish - we are reading and writing English, in which the plural of genius is definitely geniuses. If you want to pretend the plural is genii, then you should write the rest of your sentence in Latin as well. Go ahead - let’s all see how you go with that.

Reply to this comment »
Jojo says:

Leonardo de Vinci was not a mathematician. He had to visualize a problem or theory. Could not do math well.

Reply to this comment »
Trent says:

The opening paragraph communicates the authors intention. It clearly states that the list is based on other peoples studies. I understand that many great minds may have been omitted and this is a sample list that shows people who have passed on.
I think labelling a person as a true genius is something that is agreed upon based on their field of expertise, contribution to humakind and changed the course of future generations.
We probably need to categorise geniuses based on the period of time they lived in and how their work has influenced subsequent cutural, scientific, etc advancement.
I think geniuses can only be nominated many years after their death when society has the chance to reflect on their work.
At present I am sure there are many clever people living amongst us but we are not able to assess their impact on humanity at the moment.

Reply to this comment »
ventsi says:

It is strange that Albert Einstein, Bertrand Russell, George Bernard Shaw, and Nicola Tesla are not mentioned.

Reply to this comment »
Shell says:

I've got a question that might arise as sort of a point...How would one know the IQ of half if not most of these individuals. if IQ tests started in the early 1900s? I'm just really curious if anyone knows how these specific numbers were decided upon and why.

Reply to this comment »
Nikkola says:

1. Tesla....
4.Darwin....Marie Curie....
5.Goethe....Lao Tsu.....Wirginia Woolf.....Bach.....Michelangello...Tolstoj....Dostojevski
7.Aristoteles....Chuang Tsu....Rumi....Decartes....Heideger...Ibn Al Arabi...

Reply to this comment »
Tlatel says:

I can't see James William Sidis and Nikola Tesla in the list,

Reply to this comment »
anonymous says:

There is no such thing as a genius, especially in terms of IQ. Not everyone was recognized and someone can have 300 IQ and might be useless, anyone can accomplish anything, a test can't prove anything. Someone can fail school and be the one to find out how to (ex:) bend gravity.

Reply to this comment »
Veronica Gunderson says:

Have you all forgotten that maybe a lot of them were not put on there becuase of the fact that there is a fine line between genius and insanity, so if a name is not on there mayne you should double check to make sure they didn't reach insanity. And the line is so thin that ounce they go over there is no coming back so again keep that inind before you try to say why not this person or that person, and for another comment i read the reason men are more prone to be geniuses than women is and has a lot to do with how they think and react to a lot of things compared to women, im not saying all women are like that but we women tend to over think alot and we dont think at times, when men they block everything out and can think, women are always thinking what about this or what about that, well that's why men are geniuses, now there are some women who are geniuses not disagreeing with that, I just dont get why all of you are so intelligent but yet those little things right there are meaningless to you all, like they dont matter what so ever, ok so insanity doesnt matter and being a genius doesnt matter either, I mean come on and think logically for a minute before you all call the kettle black here

Reply to this comment »
Nancy c Birsch says:

How can you assign a iq number to a person who died before there was such a system? Conjecture. And really they are all men, what a suprise. Artists may make us happy and provide joy. They may move people emotionally, to where they cannot understand, but that don't make them a genius. That just means the government is trying to control your emotions. And 95% of genius are men= another of history's big fat lies.

Reply to this comment »
John Costanzo says:

I think George Orwell and Helen Keller need to be added to this list. Orwell's scientific and political imagination was so great it surely was fueled by an incredible genius mind. What Helen Keller did was so intellectually super human as to boggle the mind. If she had been born with sight and hearing her intellectual output would have been greater than any on this list. As it was, her mind's abilities were so vast it transcended 3 dimensional space time reality while blind and draf to learn about the world, process that information, and communicate original thought back at the highest level humanly achievable. Beethoven's monumental 9th symphony and his Missa Solemnis, music's absolute pinnacle, were composed while he was deaf. That's akin to Michelangelo painting the Sistine chapel completely blind!!!!!

Reply to this comment »
Michael David says:

Dear John,

It was good that you mentioned Helen Keller. Good job!

Ben Franklin in my opinion was also a genius. He was the most innovative "Founding Father".

All of you forgot William Sidis. He did not use his remarkable potential and joined radical movements.

He might have the highest IQ of all time. However, since he never achieved anything he is simply

a footnote in time.

Reply to this comment »
Siza Mbele says:

According to me they were all geniuses of the same calibre. For someone to come up with an original revolutionary idea of which none similar has ever existed.. That is pure genius!

Reply to this comment »
edwardo resmini says:

Laughable. Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772) was by far the greatest genius to walk our planet; but, being from Sweden, he has been overlooked. His i.q. was too high to be measured. Truly laughable!

Reply to this comment »
Shiva says:

Here's my list: remember everyone is interchangeable, cause we can't compare geniuses, they all have earned the title genius.

1. Newton
The father of physics, who changed our world of viewing things.

2. Mozart
Although Beethoven and Bach are truly legends, and comparable to Mozart, but I choose him because of his heavenly music and the age that he started composing.

3. Tesla
The greatest inventor of all time, who can recite whole book in one read, his contributions are enormous to the society.
4. Da Vinci
The greatest polymath of all time.

5. Goethe
The greatest philosopher of all time.

Reply to this comment »
Ruo Xing Antoinette Loh says:

My definition for creativity is short and simple. Creativity is a mental process involving intellectual inventiveness and ingenuity coupled with a capacity for intellectual originality and uniqueness. And this too is a mark of Genius.

Reply to this comment »
Jonathan says:

Then if its about genius then people like Messi or Ronaldinho should be here there passes accuracy on the ball and there vision is in a way similar to Da Vinci artistic brilliance

Reply to this comment »
Angry Potato says:

I'm sorry, I didn't quite catch that. Did you just say that Messi and Ronaldo need to be added to this list? Did they invent something? Did they discover something new? Did they help the whole world progress? Exactly, I didn't think so. Just because they can kick a soccer ball with accuracy does NOT mean they are "geniuses". Please do your research on the word "genius". Thank you for your time.

Reply to this comment »
In reply to Angry Potato's comment, Rick McDowell says:

It is the idea that there are different kinds of intelligence. In a lot of athletics, your brain is doing hundreds of calculations in an instant, incorporating relative speeds of the players and the ball, angles, wind velocity, rate of closure, force required, etc. Similarly, Beethoven might have been our greatest genius, but could he write an effective essay instead of a symphony? We have brilliant mathematicians that can barely put a sentence together.

It seems the more a genius is an outlier in one field, the more likely he is to have a serious deficiency in another. The price of genius.

Coney says:

All white males...What does that say about what the IQ test is looking for?

Reply to this comment »
jack says:

it says that males have been statistically way more likely to be geniuses, it isn't their fault that they are white or males get over yourself, not everything is oppression or an sjw topic

Reply to this comment »
In reply to jack's comment, David Grant Stewart, Sr. says:

Men are as a class more intelligent than women. Look at the track record. How many world class discoveries were made by females? Precious few. In the language of Adam, men are compared to the sun, women to the moon, and children to the stars. The moon not only has less light than the sun, but it is of altogether a different quality. It is reflected light, not radiated light. Isaiah prophesies of a time in the last days when "women are your rulers" which would indeed be lamentable. Men often marvel at female logic, which is often seriously defective.

Noah says:

This test was about Europeons if you actually read it the majority or Europeons back then were white please read the whole article before making retarded comments

Reply to this comment »
frank says:

maybe because through recorded history "white males" had the most credited ideals. why? because of racism. why write a comment like this? obviously certain groups of people had more opportunity than others. it was the past, id like to think the present has learned and moved on. stop trolling.

Reply to this comment »
In reply to frank's comment, Sameh Strauch says:

He's not trolling. He's pointing out that all of the great scientists from Asia and the Middle East (not to mention the Americas) have been left out in favour of white, European males, perpetuating the myth that white Europeans are in some way, intellectually superior.

chikwado says:

i mad that Einstein isn't there i had he's the most brilliant man in the world because he used only 10% of his brain yet had so many achievement like making of atomic bomb and he's also one of my successive role model and also why isn't Thomas Edison also added, i love him for one reason "his high patient, persistence, consistence, and believe which made him become the world greatest scientist, also made to possibility electricity bulb"

Reply to this comment »
Anonymous says:

Why don't you try reading the description on top of the page? By the way, William James Sidis was the most brilliant guy in th world. He mastered over 40 languages and has done many achievements. Albert Einstein's IQ level is 160-190.

Reply to this comment »
Winger says:

Tesla was miles in front of thomas

Reply to this comment »
lewlbewl says:

Love how everyone is mad Einstein is not here, but so little mention of Tesla, who's vision was brilliant.

Also, this list is focused on IQ, which is not really a true or accurate measure of intellect. Look up the people with the highest IQ, and their achievements will be nothing compared to others whose intelligence has a basis in imagination and vision.

Reply to this comment »
gideonhacer says:

I think Albert einstein should be at least in top three. His IQ was above 180. He was real genius in physics and mathematics

Reply to this comment »
George says:

For all the people complaining about Einstein:
"Moreover, the list didn’t include twentieth-century geniuses such as Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi and Stephen Hawking."

Reply to this comment »
Brian says:

Hmmm. Apparently some people can't read. The article starts off by stating that Einstein would not be on the list. I agree with others that Darwin, Tesla and Beethoven should have made the list. Especially Tesla.

Reply to this comment »
Dalaiman says:

what about Leonard Euler or C. F. Gauss? What about L.V. Beethoven, W. A. Mozart or J.S. Bach? If you know them and understand their music, you'll see Bach is the greatest composer by far.

Reply to this comment »
Art Burke says:

I agree! Gauss and Euler were awesome. Beethoven, Mozart, and Bach as well. The whole idea of "genius" is so difficult to evaluate and understand. The vast contributions of so many minds make the yardstick quite difficult to calibrate, especially throughout the years.

Reply to this comment »
Antony Crox says:

what about Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein?

Reply to this comment »
Daryl says:

I hoped that Archimedes would be there. I think there is an unproven but probable fact that he knew calculus, long before the world credited Isaac Newton with the crown of laurel! He is the probable architect of the Antikythera device for calculating celestial precessions! That all involves, at the very least, an understanding and a facility for differentials.

Reply to this comment »
Ricci says:

Wtf..u guys forgot EINSTEIN if it wasn't bad enough ..where is tesla,Pythagoras,achimedes,William Shakespeare???omg

Reply to this comment »
iMSoReal says:

William James Sidis is way smarter than everyone on this list, and the people you just named.(but your right some of them belong even though einstein onlY had an iq of 160 or 161)

Reply to this comment »
Switch45 says:

Try actually reading the article instead of skipping to the names/pictures. The entire intro explains exactly why they are not on the list.

Reply to this comment »
Anonymous User says:

why do u guys always forget Tesla?

Reply to this comment »
essa says:

What about Tesla?!

Reply to this comment »
Ivan says:

why the hell isn't Darwin on here? His IQ has been widely estimated to be between 185 to 220. He will certainly make it to the top 3 of the list and perhaps one of the most influential human beings that ever lived!
1. Newton
2. Darwin
3. Galileo
These are my rankings in intellectual influence to everyday life (in order). Although this is subjective, I believe what they have done is pretty extraordinary.

Reply to this comment »
Walther M. Beinhardt says:

What I read about Darwin is that he was in fact not very special. I read that in mastery from Robert Greene. But I also read some other sources that he was a very ordinary pupil. He was not very special in any big regard. So a no for him.

I find Einsteins insights much deeper and fascinating than Newtons, although, Newton has a place close to Einstein as a consequence of his great impact on physics and science in general. I have never heard of Galileo in one of the top spots but Nietzsche describes Goethe as a big European, one of the greatest. And Nietzsche was way deeper than any philosopher before him. So, next to my knowledge about Goethe, I give that a lot of credit and consider Goethe to be somewhere in the top 5.

Reply to this comment »
justice says:

What about albert einstein. Though his IQ is not upto 200 but he is regarded as a genius and one of the most intelligent people. When you talk of intelligency you talk of him.

Reply to this comment »
Æva says:

What about Nikola Tesla .. Christian Birkeland .. Blaise Pascal .. Kurt Gödel ?

The list goes on and on...

Reply to this comment »
David Justus says:

Einstein is actually greatly overrated try to think of what contributions he made to making human life a better thing or more secure or to produce more goods or services. He is far surpassed by many other Geniuses not on the list such as Henry Ford Adam Smith Thomas Alva Edison Nikola Tesla Willis carrier and the list goes on and on Einstein actually didn't contribute anything to help you manatee in any concrete weigh he is greatly overrated. His genius was actually very narrow and was limited to the fields of physics and Mathematics even the ancient Greek Archimedes contribute more to this day to human life on Earth with his invention of the Archimedes screw which is still used throughout much of the world to help irrigate fields to grow food Einstein in my opinion was the idiot of geniuses

Reply to this comment »
In reply to David Justus's comment, Caleb says:

he made it possible to create the plasma screen. he made a ammonia refrigerator. without screens we would not know half of what goes on in this world.

In reply to David Justus's comment, Charles says:

Hmm. Well then I think u don't know this guy Einstein. Einstein might have created something that caused destruction on a large scale but I assure u dat dis guy is even underrated. I discovered dat he had been said to have a lower IQ than most but he gave de best of himself. It well sounds like you are not science inclined else u shud knw him better. Einstein broke too many rules, scrabbed theories and rewrote laws. His ideas were de craziest but they were feasible. Like I mean he created an era. Just read about him

Anonymous User says:

Aristotle and Ayn Rand are the top geniuses because they created observation-based, systematic knowledge of existence as a whole, ie, philosophy. This requires more IQ than mere science, which is merely about parts of existence, eg, physics, psychology. Art, while about existence as a whole, merely shows but does not explain. Aristotle _discovered_ observation-based, rational system, ie, systematic logic and scientific method, ie, the method that the listed scientists used and that the listed artists implicitly used.

IQ is less important than chosen achievement.

Reply to this comment »
Anonymous User says:

Genius is NOT intelligence. Genius is creative ability of the highest possible kind. True most Geniuses are highly intelligent --but this depends on the field their Genius was recognized in. And here there is a plethora of problems. Recognized by whom; which people, what Society, when and where. There is an old joke that goes something like I will believe in Psychologists devising tests from Geniuses when Monkeys devise tests for Psychologists. Yes it is off the mark and makes you wonder. Between species there is another problem and it is not the same thing as WITHIN a species !.
It is said [I think correctly] that Apes have been taught to answer in sign language but none so far has ever ASKED A QUESTION using such sign language. Puts one in mind of the problem of A.I. in the Computer Field. No answer exists for this and it seems to me there is a comparison here: Human intelligence does not reach the point where it can solve such a problem. I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt this ?.
I do have ideas of my own on this, but so far no one seems interested in this. I was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records 7 editions 1982-88 under Highest I.Q. and was given a Certificate for this. I was also listed in 500 Great Minds of the Early 21 st Century in 2002. All such lists-comparisons are temporary. There appears less and less match between persons and outcomes these days. Humanity hangs by it's intellectual neck on the tree of tragedy --there are no Leonardo's in the 19 th, 20th, and so far in the 21 st Century. Yet he/she must still exist we should think ?. With mass education has come the noisy ones but no Geniuses to show for it all. Bad money has driven out good money, bad people good people. The masses have come to judge the best and are part of this process to drive out the very people they need most, all in the name of incorrectly accessed political correctness. Today the system has driven down performance; today big institutional science has been a spoiler of great insights delaying progress everywhere. Today it is business as usual. The criminal come to the top. My greatest fear is that an end is coming to the centuries of progress that mankind has grown use to. The age of Genius may be at an end. I'm sorry to ramble on this in such a `scatter gun' way.
Chris. Harding
Found I.S.P.E.

Reply to this comment »
In reply to Anonymous User's comment, Rick McDowell says:

Chris, the cat's out of the bag for Anonymous User, when you sign your name to your post. :-)

Congrats on being on the list, though I am not sure how someone can come up with this sort of list without being tongue in cheek. Talk about presumptuous. I assume it has to do with published articles, etc.

I agree with the idea of associating genius more relevantly to creativity, than to the mixed bag you get in IQ tests, where math, vocabulary, spatial recognition all come in.

On the idea that white men dominate the list, to the exclusion of Asians in particular, yes, I think this piece is geared to those of us in Western Civilization. And when you talk about that, it is pretty definitively white men. I mean, I kind of cringe when folks feel they have to put Marie Curie on the list. She identified two radioactive isotopes, working along side her husband and under the direction of another professor. She died of radiation poisoning, the thing she was an expert in: kind of puts a dent in the idea of being one of the all-time smartest.

In reply to Anonymous User's comment, Peter Wilson says:

Chris. Good comments. I really do believe that the strictures of science (and the politics of course) mean that ideas not founded on the "material matter as reality" supposition, creates a limitation. Those seeing beyond that have little support or acknowledgement from the usual suspects.

In reply to Anonymous User's comment, Anonymous User says:

DO (something)about the problem. Maybe you can or can't but trying is where it starts.Even the entire universe the biggest thing is the smallest thing at the same time it is not.You could say at the beginning it was the smallest thing (and things )that expanded with such intensity and scope and and acceleration that with one small thing this (maybe all ) universe can change.the human mind is just that human.some % of evolution=[ape-man >machine-etc] which =change. entropy is the true nature of everything without it you (can)have order logically but most times you don't.mans greatest achievement was curiosity without it we are just apes and that is the difference between us to apply that to a machine...well machines can't ever truly achieve emotion it its just machinery.but the other thing is that we are programming the computer not just giving it a way to express its self through sign language in this instance we are evolution to the machine and the machine given it nature which we can never truly go inside will correct its self. change and entropy govern everything. the concept of "genius"is relative just a term from a high evolved ape but genius is just a difference in the brain like Einsteins his was examined by "normal"people who found out some of what made him him but to measure that defeats the purpose of the iq test which was just made for people who were not normal or Einstein if you catch my drift and also current machines have the processing power more than any human ever and we made the dang thing so nothing is off the table kinda

Anonymous User says:

Einstein's IQ was only a few points above the borderline for genius, 152. His IQ was only 160, so he is not one of the most intellegent.

Reply to this comment »
In reply to Anonymous User's comment, Anonymous User says:

What IQ truly is, a very poor indicator of how successful someone will be throughout their life

In reply to Anonymous User's comment, daniel says:

IQ has a threshold. Once a person has met a certain requirement of IQ, other factors become more important in determining their success and overall impact on the world. That is why Einstein had an IQ of 160 and was the most brilliant mind ever, while Christopher Langan has an IQ of 195, and has experienced no such success, rather failure after failure.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.


Why is FinancesOnline free? Why is FinancesOnline free?

FinancesOnline is available for free for all business professionals interested in an efficient way to find top-notch SaaS solutions. We are able to keep our service free of charge thanks to cooperation with some of the vendors, who are willing to pay us for traffic and sales opportunities provided by our website. Please note, that FinancesOnline lists all vendors, we’re not limited only to the ones that pay us, and all software providers have an equal opportunity to get featured in our rankings and comparisons, win awards, gather user reviews, all in our effort to give you reliable advice that will enable you to make well-informed purchase decisions.